🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a new game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but features a few key changes:

• Each team includes only eight real players, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities done by real players grant full XP, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Only two maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Elements like Player tags, achievements, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, this mode lives up to its name: it offers a casual version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume it's a good idea, as it gives additional choices for players seeking different methods to have fun with the title. But, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. In other words, many BF6 fans are mad.

Community Responses: Anger to Support

"People want human opponents. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," reads a response to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking concept," says a different user. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user notes, "It's unclear where we are going with this game," while another details all the issues they believe to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, real players prevent it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this game all the time. Allow them to find a middle ground," states another. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is perfect for me," and another applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Criticisms and Community Feedback

All that said, players have valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it will make queue times even longer for other modes due to the large amount of playlists in the game already. On a similar note, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the system. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base compromising in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. Another describes this addition as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, what prompted them to change it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Tasks that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. Chances are that, should analytics indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.