🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.